The focus of this study was for students using an extensive hypermedia environment
to state how the program's features, tools, or commands reflected four theoretical
constructs: 1) semantic networks, 2) concept maps, 3) frames/scripts, and
4) schemata. Two exercises were created: 1) context-weak and 2) context-strong.
It was found that, when the context was strong, the students cited more
semantic networks and concept maps than when the context was weak. They,
however, cited more frames/scripts and schemata when the context was weak
than when the context was strong. In addition to viewing the four construct-models
individually, the results were interpreted when establishing a linear construct-models
group (semantic networks and frames/scripts) and a nonlinear construct-models
group (concept maps and schemata). Results were also interpreted when grouping
the construct-models as information-structure construct-models (semantic
networks and concept maps) and as user-practiced construct-models (frames/scripts
and schemata).
We hope you found what you needed on this page. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact me.
Howard J. Bender, Ph.D.
President
The Education Process Improvement Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 186
Riverdale, Maryland 20738
hjbender@epicent.com