![[the epicenter]](../../banner.gif)
![[Educational Journals - Computers & Technology]](computer0.gif)
![]()
The focus of this study was for students using an extensive hypermedia environment
to state how the program's features, tools, or commands reflected four theoretical
constructs: 1) semantic networks, 2) concept maps, 3) frames/scripts, and
4) schemata. Two exercises were created: 1) context-weak and 2) context-strong.
It was found that, when the context was strong, the students cited more
semantic networks and concept maps than when the context was weak. They,
however, cited more frames/scripts and schemata when the context was weak
than when the context was strong. In addition to viewing the four construct-models
individually, the results were interpreted when establishing a linear construct-models
group (semantic networks and frames/scripts) and a nonlinear construct-models
group (concept maps and schemata). Results were also interpreted when grouping
the construct-models as information-structure construct-models (semantic
networks and concept maps) and as user-practiced construct-models (frames/scripts
and schemata).
![]()
We hope you found what you needed on this page. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact me.
![]()
Howard J. Bender, Ph.D.
President
The Education Process Improvement Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 186
Riverdale, Maryland 20738
hjbender@epicent.com