Differences in Knowledge-Building Between Two Types of Networked Learning Environments: An Information-Flow Analysis

Jun Oshima
Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol 19 No 3, 1998, p. 329-351

The main purpose of the present study was to examine how elementary school students improve their scientific discourse on a computer-networked database environment called "Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments (CSILE)." Students in two, five to six grade combined classrooms taught by the same teacher engaged in their computer-mediated collaborative learning for five weeks by utilizing different system configurations: single-note based (S-CSILE) vs. discussion-note based (D-CSILE). Tracking files automatically recorded by the system were used for an analysis of students' learning activities. Results showed that system affordance specially designed for joint written discourse in D-CSILE significantly facilitated students' joint knowledge-transformation activities as well as maintained each individual's activity to pursue her own agenda. Importance of such a system affordance was discussed from the perspective of distributed cognition.
 
 
 
 

We hope you found what you needed on this page. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Howard J. Bender, Ph.D.
President
The Education Process Improvement Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 186
Riverdale, Maryland 20738
hjbender@epicent.com