James A. White & Daniel M. Purdom
Educational Technology Review, Autumn 1996, No 6, p. 5-9
An important purpose for studying varying conceptions of curriculum is
that apparent conflicts in educational practices begin to make sense if
one understands the mind-sets that are behind the conflicting practices.
Educators who can articulate their personal beliefs and who can identify
differing beliefs among their colleagues are better prepared to deal with
content, method, organization, and evaluation of curriculum in their own
teaching. In the case of modern instructional technology, the value of
this tenet cannot be understated. Each of the major conceptions of curriculum
views technology differently. In this paper, the authors have striven to
identify some of the dominant themes in hopes of raising more productive
questions about the relationships between instructional technologies and
education.
We hope you found what you needed on this page. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact me.
Howard J. Bender, Ph.D.
President
The Education Process Improvement Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 186
Riverdale, Maryland 20738
hjbender@epicent.com