Lorena F. Ruberg, David M. More, and C. David Taylor
Journal of Educational Computing
Research, Vol. 14(3), 1996, p. 243-268
This case study provides a description of student interaction and participation
within a computer-mediated environment in an experimental offering of a
plant science lab course. Based on structured classroom observation, interviews,
and surveys with students and teachers this study examines 1) how a CMC
pattern of discourse differs from a face-to-face pattern of discussion in
a class setting; 2) whether students participating in a CMC activity produce
a discourse that reflects the level of thinking and sharing of ideas desired
by the instructor; and 3) how the computer-based interface facilitates and/or
inhibits communication between students. This study shows that the CMC-based
activities offers an alternative pattern of interaction which differs from
the face-to-face pattern in some, but not all ways. The CMC discourse encourages
experimentation, sharing of early ideas, increased and more distributed
participation, and collaborative thinking. However, for some students the
CMC activities are confusing and inhibiting because of the lack of social
cues and multiple threads of simultaneous topics - the same features that
appeal to other students. Successful use of CMC activities requires a classroom
social environment that encourages peer interaction. Equally important is
the selection of engaging tasks that are structured enough to diminish confusion
but still allow spontaneity and experimentation. Teachers also need to find
ways to directly link the CMC discussions to prior and upcoming learning
activities so that students will see the value in creating a discourse that
they will want to refer to and use in other class activities.
We hope you found what you needed on this page. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact me.
Howard J. Bender, Ph.D.
President
The Education Process Improvement Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 186
Riverdale, Maryland 20738
hjbender@epicent.com