Ivy Sea's Enlightened-Leadership Series
DO YOU HAVE TRIBES OR FACTIONS?
WHY IT MAKES SENSE TO UNITE ON COMMON GROUND

As evidenced throughout nature, amidst chaos there is order, often created by a natural convergence of compatible, symbiotic beings. We humans organize ourselves deliberately through where we live, the careers we select and hobbies, for example, as well as indirectly, such as by belief systems.

In an organizational setting, these groupings can be the catalysts for brilliant ideas and the fuel that sustains success; or they can corrode the organization’s vision and siphon energy from the group's purpose, resulting in time and effort being spent managing an unhealthy environment. The difference? The first type of group is a tribe, the latter a collection of factions.

Are Your Groups Tribes or Factions?

Leaders who are well-connected to employees know when groups are tribes: members work together toward a common goal shared by the rest of the organization. Goals are met, retention and morale are high, and work redundancy is low.

Likewise, the presence of factions can be felt throughout an organization — and especially by leaders. Evidence of factions can include:

an "us versus them" mentality,

the tendency to put one's own or the group’s short-term preferences above the goals of another department or the company as a whole,

keeping others uninformed about projects or not sharing information, and making decisions that affect others without their input.

The consequences of such self-preservation-oriented, factional behaviors include low morale and an unproductive, entrenched company culture that prevents an organization from fully realizing its vision and highest potential. Of course, the individuals and groups within the organization also end up meeting lower standards as compared to their potential.

Potential Causes

The reasons that people create factions are many. Yet when whittled down to their essence, the reasons all have fear at their roots: Fear of losing perceived status, fear of losing control, fear of success, fear of being outshone (or outshining others), fear of the unknown, and so on. One of the ways to help reduce fear is to communicate skillfully and respectfully.

For example, think of field-based employees who are cynical about decisions presented from headquarters, and perhaps angry that their corporate-office colleagues issue mandates to them about how to do the work in the field. Some frontline employees may be frustrated as to why they’re rarely asked for input on issues that relate directly to work done in the field — and the customers with whom they have regular (and direct) contact. What field personnel in this example crave is information, rationale, and an opportunity to contribute their expertise and observations on issues relating to frontline work, which would help provide an assurance that the people in headquarters understand the frontline reality.

Corporate employees and leaders, for their part, may see themselves as better suited than the frontline employees are for such strategic decision-making, and assume that planning and policy-making is a "top down" function. In some worst case scenarios, a leader or manager may like the powerful feeling of working in a vacuum and then dictating policies or procedures "down to the line." In response, some frontline employees may sabotage efforts, or withhold their expertise or best work in order to frustrate headquarters staff in return.

Effective Remedies

Some of the building-blocks for improving communication and building stronger relationships between real or potential factions include:

A clear organizational vision, which serves as a compass for everyone in the company. The organizational vision, and the departmental and individual visions that align with it, is a first step toward creating common ground for all employees of the organization.

Division goals that mirror company goals, rather than create factions. For instance, a human-resources team whose success is measured by the number of candidates they recruit or review is incongruent with a company whose vision is to grow qualitatively, not quantitatively.

An exchange program, where people trade jobs for a day to experience "the other side."

Dialogue sessions that include a cross-section of people from throughout the organization, and allow people to safely express their perspectives and opinions.

Work teams that include people from throughout the organization, or at least representing all key stakeholder groups. Where appropriate, the team leader would represent the group most affected by the issues under consideration by the team.

Feedback loops that allow for easy access and genuine, timely responses.

Actions that demonstrate that values discussed and agreed upon. This goes for executives, managers and employees.

Communication vehicles that are consistently produced and updated, are compatible with and reinforce the company culture, that humanize the individuals within various departments or groups, and meet the information needs of all stakeholders.

For example, a heavy reliance on the company intranet is ludicrous and ineffective if frontline employees don’t have convenient access to the network. In the same sense, relying on terms such as Leadership or Management or HR or The Field dehumanize the people working in those groups and makes it easier to adopt an "us versus them" mentality.

A greater path toward true teamwork and mutually beneficial interactions is to first define, and then unite on, common ground. Reaffirming those ideals, hopes and goals that people share allows the manufactured chaos found in factions to sort itself into a like-minded group, focusing energies in the same direction, which everyone agrees will be rewarding.

For leaders, this means:

Developing and sustaining a vision — This vision will help you attract the people who resonate most with it, and who will help you achieve it. Be certain to consult your vision when making decisions, to communicate it regularly and in relation to all business decisions, and to ask employees to contribute examples of how they are inspired by and connected to the vision.

Allowing the system to weed out the flotsam and jetsam— The clearer the organization’s vision, the easier it is to see where adjustments need to be made. This includes who’s on board. Leaders know that this sloughing off is part of the evolutionary process.

Listening to employees’ voices — Stay on top of what’s happening throughout the organization by truly listening to what employees have to say. They make up your organization, culture and results. Tap their experience and opinions to learn what the common ground is, and where it might be fractured.

Demonstrating and sharing examples of the "common ground in action" — Words can become vapid when not followed with action. Show how you and the organization are living the "common ground" and the results everyone is reaping.

And remember, leadership is not just a title; it's a trait that anyone, regardless of job category, can nurture and demonstrate. As Mohandas Gandhi said, you must be the change you wish to see in the world (and that includes your world-of-work).

For more information and approaches to uniting people on common ground and strengthening your vision, visit some of the Ivy Sea Online resources listed below.

This information is food-for-thought, not customized counsel. The most effective approach is the one that's been tailored to meet the unique needs of you and your group. If you have questions, connect with an adviser who offers a perspective you trust and value. You may also e-mail us to discuss the possibilities.

Ivy Sea, Inc.

51 Federal Street

Suite 307

San Francisco, CA

94107

T 415.778.3910

F 415.778.3911

info@ivysea.com

Brain Food Cafeteria

Organizational Communication

Small-Enterprise Owner's Portal

Wisdom and Mastery Portal

What else would you like to see us cover? What are your key communication issues as an organizational leader? Let us know!