Legacy
of a Kidnapping: The Triumph of the Tabloids
Charles Lindbergh, albeit reluctantly, was at once one of the Tabloid Age’s first heroes and victims. When in 1927 this 25-year-old American innocently emerged out of the clouds from his solo Trans-Atlantic flight, the press found a ready-made symbol for an ascendant world power emerging from the disillusionment and dissoluteness of the post World War I “lost generation.” The press therefore five years later easily transformed the kidnapping and murder of his infant son into a monumental moral drama of good and evil set against the background of a Depression-traumatized America. Lapham demonstrates how publisher William Randolph Hearst, the father of “yellow journalism,” stage-managed the case from the start. Hearst was unapologetic about his journalistic ethics. “The public,” he proclaimed, ”wants entertainment not information.” He spear-headed the press in a nationwide hunt for the Lindbergh kidnapper; even Al Capone put up a $10,000 reward from his jail cell. Extra editions, made possible by new printing technology and prefiguring our own 24-hour news, breathlessly announced each meaningless new detail of the case. As a side-effect of the case, which carried on from 1932 through 1935, the number of tabloids tripled from 12 to 35. When a suspect, Bruno Hauptman, conveniently a German national, was finally found, Hearst actually hired his lawyer, an incompetent but comic alcoholic who received gifts of call girls and champagne throughout the trial from the press baron. Journalists and celebrities from around the world swarmed to this the first of many “trials of the century,” ridiculed by curmudgeon and columnist H.L. Mencken as “the greatest event since the Resurrection.” Cutting back and forth, Lapham shows how Hearst’s troika of celebrity journalists, Damon Runyan, Adela Rogers St. James and Walter Winchell, officiated over this national purification ritual with the same unctuous sanctimony as Barbara Walters, Diane Sawyer and Dan Rather. Lapham does not take the easy way out by simply “blaming the media.” Instead, he notes a national preference for comforting moral fables over complex political realities, which increasingly turns public discourse into a sterile clash of symbols, incapable of change, growth or compromise. If the tabloid press during the Lindbergh case kidnapped American public discourse, it wasn’t because the American public wasn’t watching. ![]() |
“Lewis
Lapham’s surgical essay on journalism then and now is a deliciously
wicked assault on current ethics and values. It is particularly apt
as the television networks wallow in the muck of so-called ‘reality
programming’ -- created reality, of course, [of which] Mr. Hearst would
have been proud.” Producer: Libby
Handros
Video Purchase: $195
|